AFBCMR BC-2012-04391
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT be corrected to show that the abdominal circumference component of his Fitness
Assessment dated 22 May 2012, reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System.
The applicant has been advised of the recommended relief and agrees that it is full and
fitting.
Members of the Board considered this application on 14 May 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachments:
1. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM dated 24 January 2013
2. Email, AFPC/DPSIM dated 11 May 2013
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04629
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. The applicant has been advised of the recommended relief and agrees that it is full and fitting. Members of the Board, considered this application on 18 June 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05582
AFBCMR BC-2012-05582 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05767
AFBCMR BC-2012-05767 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03521
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to exempt the cardio component of his FA dated 24 July 2012. The medical evidence provided in support of his request is noted; however, in the absence of a copy of his fitness score sheet for his FA dated 24 July 2012 and his AF Form 108, stating that he had a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing fitness score, we find...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03993 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 25 April 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note that said correction will not result in the applicant receiving an overall passing score, given the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00608
AFBCMR BC-2013-00608 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02801
If she had been on the correct profile when she completed the June 2011 FA, she would have passed the FA with a 75.5 score and would not have received the referral EPR. DPSID states that based on the AFPC/DPSIM advisory to grant the relief sought to exempt the cardio component of the FA dated 8 June 2011, they contend that the fitness assessment failure is an inappropriate comment on the contested referral EPR, and as a result, the referral EPR should be removed from her record. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05719
If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. While in this case the applicants medical condition was validated by a military medical provider, there is no evidence the commander invalidated the assessment. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05896
DPSIM states that the evidence provided by the applicant substantiates a medical condition existed that restricted her from performing all components of the FA except the abdominal circumference. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error...